Meta Analysis vs Systematic Review: Key Differences Explained
In modern research, evidence-based decision-making relies heavily on comprehensive reviews of existing studies. Two widely used approaches in synthesizing research are Meta Analysis and Systematic Review . Although these terms are often used interchangeably, they are distinct methods with different purposes and processes. Understanding their differences is crucial for researchers, students, and professionals across healthcare, social sciences, and other domains. What is a Systematic Review? A Systematic Review is a structured method of reviewing all relevant studies on a particular research question. Unlike traditional reviews, systematic reviews follow a rigorous methodology that ensures transparency, reproducibility, and minimal bias. Key Features of a Systematic Review Conducts a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases. Uses clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. Critically appraises the quality of included studies. Summarizes find...