Meta-Analysis vs Systematic Review: Key Differences Every Researcher Should Know
In evidence-based research, two methods stand out for producing reliable conclusions — Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis . While many use these terms interchangeably, they are not the same. Each plays a distinct role in research synthesis, supporting scholars, healthcare professionals, and policymakers in making informed decisions. This blog explores the differences, methodology, and benefits of both, along with why Statswork is a trusted partner for research support. What Is a Systematic Review? A Systematic Review is a structured and comprehensive approach to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant studies on a particular research question. It uses predefined protocols, ensuring transparency, consistency, and minimal bias. Key characteristics of a systematic review: Uses strict inclusion and exclusion criteria Follows a systematic literature search process Critically evaluates the quality of studies Summarizes findings through ...